I have to thank the guys over at NoAgenda Show for finding this incredible audio. This audio clip proves what I’ve often said, that our shameful “news” media is intent on instigating racial animosity for ulterior motives.
Posts from the ‘Social Issues’ Category
Hours after a horrible mass shooting of 9 black americans, inside a church, by a white 21 year old male I came across this story on the homepage of yahoo.com
Black Americans Are Killed At 12 Times The Rate Of People In Other Developed Countries
First I briefly skimmed through the article, noticed charts and graphs, so I figured I’d get a pretty good idea of the severity of the situation by taking a better read. I learned that blacks in America were definitely at higher risk of being victims of homicides, and there are stats to prove it. However after reading this article, published hours after a white guy killed 9 people in a black church I found something odd, one vital statistic was left out.
About 90% of African American Homicides are Committed by other African Americans
(AUDIO) Ghettos weren’t an accident, they were intentionally created by New Deal Liberal Progressives
Mark Levin explained today, via this NPR article, how it was the intentional New Deal federal progressive policies that created the ghettos we see today, that they didn’t just occur by accident or by white flight. LISTEN
The following is my response to a mass email sent out to everyone at work, asking us to call some number to support the passage of Net Neutrality legislation. “I consider equal access to information (Net Neutrality) one of the most important issues our government has considered in my lifetime” said the email, so I had to respond. I decided to post this because readers might find it useful, and of course, feel free to share….
Some research you are not hearing in the mainstream news or from reddit activists about Net Neutrality, not trying to influence anyone or shut down anyone’s opinions, but since there is plenty being ignored about the topic its worth a listen for those trying to decide how strongly they should support what all the cool kids are supporting….
Simple overview of what this whole net neutrality thing is for those who havent been keeping up, the actual tech behind it as well as audio of a conference call with Comcast’s CEO to investors about the metered internet, which net neutrality supporters dont realize they are sweeping in… Both of these guys (Adam Curry & John C Dvorak) are pretty well known techies & independent podcasters (listener supported/no advertisers)
next THIS YOUTUBE LINK http://youtu.be/ge53L3c1ZAE?t=1h19m which should start at 1:19:00, skip ahead if it doesnt, Further research on the origins of the net neutrality debate, (time warner, comcast, netflix…)
“Where’s the hashtags and calls of condemation from our White House?…” – Mr. B
By Katharine Lackey
A court sentenced a pregnant, Christian Sudanese woman to death by hanging Thursday after she refused to renounce her faith, a decision Amnesty International called “abhorrent.”
Meriam Ibrahim, 27, was convicted on charges of “apostasy” — the crime of abandoning or renouncing a religion. The court also ordered Ibrahim — who married a Christian man in 2011 and is eight months pregnant — to receive 100 lashes for “adultery” because her marriage is considered void under sharia law. The couple has a child, a 20-month-old boy, who is currently in detention with her.
“The fact that a woman has been sentenced to death for her religious choice, and to flogging for being married to a man of an allegedly different religion is appalling and abhorrent,” Manar Idriss, Amnesty International’s Sudan researcher, said in a statement. “Adultery and apostasy are acts which should not be considered crimes at all. It is flagrant breach of international human rights law.”
Court officials gave Ibrahim three days to recant Christianity and return to Islam. When the deadline expired Thursday, Ibrahim told religious clerics in court in the capital of Khartoum, “I am Christian,” NBC News reported. Ibrahim’s lawyer said the verdict will be appealed within 15 days, CNN reported.
Read the Rest @ Sudanese woman sentenced to death for her faith.
NAACP Was Set to Give L.A. Clippers Owner Sterling Lifetime Achievement Award Next Month Before Racist Comments. What About all the previous Racism?
By Scared Monkeys
NAACP was for giving a racist NBA Basketball owner a Lifetime Achievement Award, before they were against it … WHERE WERE THEY BEFORE WITH HIS PREVIOUS RACIST ACTS?
The L.A. Clippers owner Donald Sterling was supposed to receive a Lifetime Achievement Award next month from the NAACP’s Los Angeles chapter. However, that was before Sterling was caught on an audio tape making racist and disgusting comments to his girlfriend regarding minorities. The award was supposed to be given on May 15, 2014. Upon the surfacing of the explosive and highly racial audio, the NAACP urged the chapter to withdraw Sterling from its honoree list and suggests that “African Americans and Latinos should honor his request and not attend the games.”
Sorry, my question is not that the NAACP is rescinding this Lifetime Achievement Award, it is why the so-called civil rights group ever gave it to him in the first place? Hey NAACP, Why so Silent?
High-achieving women such as Beyonce and Condoleezza Rice have joined Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg’s new campaign to ban the word “bossy.” No, really. They want to ban the word “bossy.” Here are just a few of the reasons that’s a horrible idea.
1) Banning words is un-American
Full stop. I shouldn’t have to point this out. You’ve heard the phrase “It’s a free country”? Yeah, well that’s ‘murica we’re talking about. Let Putin ban words and thoughts. We don’t do that. We embrace thinking and full utilization of not just the English language but every language. If you teach me how to say something funny in Mandarin, I’m going to say it. Because I’m an American.
2) Girls are strong. Stop overprotecting them
It completely conflicts with the “Lean-In” message to treat girls like they’re dainty little flowers who change their entire personalities if someone utters a not-even-that-mean word in their general direction. If you want women to take over companies and give up their wombs until they’re approaching 40 to do so, you have to toughen them up, not cater to their slightest hurt feelings. Seriously.
By Michael Brendan Dougherty
The fight over gay marriage is pitting equality against pluralism. Both are essential. The controversy around the concept of religious liberty — whether in the form of birth control mandates resulting from the Affordable Care Act, or nondiscrimination lawsuits related to same-sex marriage — can seem like a straightforward conflict between retrograde religion and the progressive state.
But in truth the battle over religious liberty is a conflict within liberalism itself. In one corner are the liberal values of pluralism and tolerance. In the other are the liberal projects of egalitarianism and administrative efficiency. The quick and decisive defeat of Arizona’s attempt to clarify its state version of the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) is evidence that our increasingly monocultural elite class is inclined to resolve these conflicts in favor of its egalitarian goals. But, it should tread carefully.
The pluralism of the United States has allowed diverse religious charities, health-care institutions, schools, and universities to flourish. These institutions define their own priorities and their own missions. Yeshivas do not teach the New Testament. Catholic universities make their chapels available for weddings of students whose marriages will be conducted according to the faith, and only those marriages. Those priorities may seem obvious and unimportant to you, the very definition of parochial.
But when the administrative state barges in, this pluralism can take on far greater implications.
By Brenda Gazzar
Tisha Morrison, 46, of Pacoima found herself taking refuge in the Los Angeles area after her Louisiana home was destroyed by Hurricane Ike in 2008.
Today, the single mother of eight, who lost her part-time job at a shelter in May after it closed, struggles to stretch her roughly $1,225 in welfare and food stamps that she receives each month to care for her and her five young children who live at home. “We barely make it,” Morrison said Wednesday, noting that three of her children have developmental disabilities. “I have a retired veteran boyfriend and he helps me with my loose ends.”
By Thomas Sowell
I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.
Apparently other Americans also recognize that the sources of racism are different today from what they were in the past. According to a recent Rasmussen poll, 31 percent of blacks think that most blacks are racists, while 24 percent of blacks think that most whites are racist.
The difference between these percentages is not great, but it is remarkable nevertheless. After all, generations of blacks fought the white racism from which they suffered for so long. If many blacks themselves now think that most other blacks are racist, that is startling.
The moral claims advanced by generations of black leaders — claims that eventually touched the conscience of the nation and turned the tide toward civil rights for all — have now been cheapened by today’s generation of black “leaders,” who act as if it is all just a matter of whose ox is gored.
Even in legal cases involving terrible crimes — the O.J. Simpson murder trial or the charges of gang rape against Duke University students — many black “leaders” and their followers have not waited for facts about who was guilty and who was not, but have immediately taken sides, based on who was black and who was white.
I wonder why ABC, NBC and CBS news haven’t covered this developing news story. Media censorship?
by Elizabeth Harrington
(CNSNews.com) –The defense attorney for late-term abortionist Dr. Kermit Gosnell, who is on trial for murdering babies who survived abortions, told a Philadelphia court today that it is “ludicrous” to claim that “a baby is born alive because it moves one time without any other movement.”
The judge in the case today threw out three of the eight murder charges against Gosnell.
“If we are going in this room to say a baby is born alive because it moves one time without any other movement, that is ludicrous,” defense attorney Jack McMahon said.
… Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Jeffrey P. Minehart granted judgment of acquittal for the first-degree murder charges of three babies in the case, identified as “Baby B,” “Baby C,” and “Baby G.”
According to the grand jury report, Baby C was “moving and breathing for 20 minutes before an assistant came in and cut the spinal cord, just the way she had seen Gosnell do it so many times.”
Kareema Cross, who worked at the clinic, testified to the grand jury that the baby was moving and breathing for 20 minutes before Lynda Williams cut the back of its neck.
… During her testimony she said cutting the necks of babies born alive during abortion procedures was “standard procedure” at Womens Medical Society, Gosnell’s abortion clinic in West Philadelphia, to “ensure fetal demise.”
Gosnell’s defense lawyer Jack McMahon argued that Williams “only saw one arm, one movement, one spasm.” “This wasn’t a baby moving!” he said, when arguing that all counts against his client should be dropped.
So President Obama thinks California’s Kamala Harris is “by far the best-looking attorney general in the country.” But does he deserve all the grief he’s getting for saying that out loud?On MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” Friday, usually an Obama-friendly zone, the president came in for some criticism over his comment the day before at a fundraiser near San Francisco for the Democratic National Committee.“I’m sure he meant to pay her a compliment … but quite frankly, it just divides women and it just divides people up to separate them by looks and probably was a little ham-fisted,” said host Mika Brzezinski. “I think he made a mistake.”
… Basically, this is all taking place at a swanky fundraiser in Atherton, Calif. – at the home of Levi Strauss heir John Goldman – and the president is relaxed and jovial, and just saying what he thinks. The republic will not fall over this. And it’s not as if Obama has a reputation as a skirt-chaser, as did some of his predecessors.
So, when Romney mentions “binders full of women” most likely referring to resumes stored in binders, its sexist, when the President refers to the AG’s looks its spun as “political correctness run amok?” Gotta love our protectionist news media….
The political cover continues @ Why Obama’s ‘Best Looking’ Comment Failed to Ignite Furor
and for further consideration…