Proof of Political Benghazi Cover Up
Visit the following link for an ABC News video story covering how the Benghazi cover up was perpetrated for POLITICAL PURPOSES before the 2012 election, which is what critics were saying all along. Too bad ABC was intentionally asleep when it mattered. For all those people saying these hearings are political, what’s political about uncovering misleading statements regarding the death of the first US Ambassador in 30 years and 3 other Americans? Keep digging, and DO YOUR JOB mainstream news media. How about starting with including Victoria Nuland’s relationship to Hillary Clinton in the PRINT version of your news story, so I don’t have to add it in like I do below.
Read the Full Story @ Exclusive: Benghazi Talking Points Underwent 12 Revisions, Scrubbed of Terror Reference
By Johnathan Karl
When it became clear last fall that the CIA’s now discredited Benghazi talking points were flawed, the White House said repeatedly the documents were put together almost entirely by the intelligence community, but White House documents reviewed by Congress suggest a different story.
ABC News has obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that show they were extensively edited as they evolved from the drafts first written entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress and to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice before she appeared on five talk shows the Sunday after that attack.
White House emails reviewed by ABC News suggest the edits were made with extensive input from the State Department. The edits included requests from the State Department that references to the Al Qaeda-affiliated group Ansar al-Sharia be deleted as well references to CIA warnings about terrorist threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack.
That would appear to directly contradict what White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said about the talking points in November.
… In an email to officials at the White House and the intelligence agencies, State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland (Hillary Clinton’s Spokesperson at the State Department) took issue with including that information because it “could be abused by members [of Congress] to beat up the State Department for not paying attention to warnings, so why would we want to feed that either? Concerned …”
The paragraph was entirely deleted…